Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Christ Must Have Preeminence in ALL THINGS/Christ Must be the Root Cause of All Advocacy

"And [Christ] is before all things, and by him all things consist.

And [Christ] is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence."  -- Colossian 1:17,18

I performed an interesting search on, with the term, "all things Christ". At the time I did not realize that Colossians 1:17,18 did not contain the actual word, "Christ", but I did find many great and rich passages of scripture. These scriptures and the practical application that follows from them continues to baffle and confuse professing Christians of our day. And it is confusing to them because of that key word; professing.

"They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate." -- Titus 1:16

In general, there should be no clash between white advocacy and Christ. No more clash than there should be between home school advocacy and Christ. Or home birth advocacy and Christ. This is because, to the true Christian, those things can and should be done for the glory of Jesus Christ. Why do I home school and advocate for it? So that Christ may be glorified further. It does not glorify Christ to have our people send their children to be taught Marxism and anti-Christ doctrines. Why should we advocate to preserve our race, culture, and heritage? Because Christ created the races so they might seek him:

"And [God] hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:" -- Acts 17:26,27

And doubly so because Christ was glorified in Western culture and society. Our unique, God-breathed culture brought glory to Christ. It is worth preserving only because of Christ, however.

For the typical white advocate, he has no such motive. His motive to preserve his people and culture are for the glory and/or pleasure of man. He does not start with Christ, he starts with man. And thus, a humanist in heart, he separates white advocacy from Christ. That is why he is able to work together in unison with Christ-haters for, what is his true god- his race.

The first commandment is what Colossians 1:17,18 is all about. Christ is to be the sole motivation for every thought, deed, action, etc. If he is not, then we are in sin. Every thought is to be held captive to Christ (2Corinthians 10:5). And if every thought, how much more every action, especially the high impact decisions we make!

This is pre-school Christianity, but the natural man cannot understand the things of the spirit of God (1Corinthians 2:14). Being a child of the devil, he must separate his "religion" from his "activism". Because his activism has its root in humanism, not in Christ.

The only cause a Christian has is the cause of glorifying Christ. All other causes are sub-causes based on the preeminent cause of Christ's exaltation. Whether it be white advocacy, home schooling, or home birth, if any of these causes clash with the cause of Christ being exalted, then Christ must win out. Our affections and love must be on Christ above all things, or else we are guilty of idolatry.

This is probably the key reason in summary, why Christianity and the White Advocacy Movement do not mix. True Christianity has it's chief end to glorify God. The white advocate, whether he claims to be Christian or not, makes his race preeminent in all things. That is why he is so appalled at the Christian White Advocate (who is actually a genuine Christian) for putting anything above his people. His god does not want the competition. You would dare put a non-white Christian brother ahead of one of your own people? Why!!! That is treason! This type of reaction is a revelation of who the true god of the "Christian" white advocate is.  

As I have been teaching through Rushdoony's Institutes of Biblical Law, I recall a particular form of reasoning/interpretation regarding the 1st commandment. Rushdoony made the point that treason was essentially rebelling against the god and/or law order of a society. The death penalty is the punishment for acts of treason; a complete cutting off from society. Thus the link between the god of a society and treason.

I have been banished, called an "enemy" and "anti-white", essentially being notified that I committed an act of treason. The cause for this condemnation is because I committed treason against the god of the white nationalist; his god is the white race. If you put Christ above the white race in the white nationalist community, you are ousted for your treason. The unity and fellowship is not simply based on race, through Christ, but rather, based on race alone, Christ being made optional.

Hear the talk in the white nationalist community and you will hear people talking about how they can't let something non-essential like religion, get in the way of their unity as whites. Can someone explain to me how any Christian can take part in such blasphemy? Can anyone still deny that the white version of humanism is not the true god of such a system of beliefs?

It makes sense that Orthodox Christians, who are already idolaters of images (done in the name of Christ, falsely) would carry over further idolatry to their race. The true shame however, is that folks who claim Christ alone, and Bible alone, would fall into this kind of trap. If we spend more time, and have sweeter fellowship with Christ-haters (and have more in common with them) than we do with fellow Christians, then this is a key indicator that such a person does not know Christ. Why would someone who does not know Christ want to enjoy the fellowship of others who love Christ intimately?

Let's revisit 2Corinthians 6:14-18

"Wherefore, come out from among them and be ye separate.... and...."

And what, you might ask?

"And I will receive you.

 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty."

What does this imply? It implies that those who are unequally yoked with unbelievers will not be received by God, nor will they be his sons and daughters. Plain and simple. May Christ open the eyes of his true elect, and have mercy upon those who are caught in the trap of lies promoted by false brethren.

Swiss Kinist

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Christ is Simply a Means to and End In the General Christian Pro-White Movement

So, I recently got caught up in a comments section type of "debate" if you want to call it that. I have, since I abandoned Facebook several years ago, sought to avoid online debates. They usually are never profitable, and I have better things to do with my time; like raising a family for the glory of God. Which, by the way, almost all pro-white advocates are absolutely NOT doing, or at best, are doing a very poor job at.

There are exceptions, of course, but not many that I have come across. Although a did recently meet a family in Tennessee that is pro-white, but they are advocates of Christian Identity doctrine, which I absolutely disagree with. But nevertheless, they are a very godly family. They were a breath of fresh air. They were actually concerned about matters of personal and community holiness and were appalled at the entire "Yeah! I'm drinking beer!!!"-- you know, those type of Christians who have more in common with the world than they do with other Christians.

Here are some links that go along with what I am writing here:

Let it be known, first of all, that I do not take anyone's side in this whole thing. I take the side of Christ, and of his word. Typically when I get involved in a debate, I take a clear side, but in this case, I see no way to do that. My guess is that it will be interpreted by some that I am "anti-white" which is what I think one side is falsely accusing the other of. On the other hand, I will get accused of being a "Judaizer" or whatever the opposite of anti-white is in this debate. I don't really care about anything but the truth of Christ.

Guys like Scott Terry and Matt Parrott are extremely valuable and have many great qualities; that I want to say off the bat. But I won't join in with them in condemning Todd Lewis. Neither will I utterly condemn Parrott or Terry (Scott Terry should know that I love him deeply; we know one another beyond the walls of the Internet and he knows I would lay down my life for him), though I think from the little I have heard of Todd Lewis, he is valuable as well.

To sum things up very shortly, because I don't care to get too detailed on this post, the debate is among Christians who are pro-white advocates in some sense. The issue is, should a pro-white Christian join in fellowship with white anti-Christs, to promote "the cause" of the pro-white movement? Myself, and some other contend that 2Corinthians 6:14-18 makes it utterly clear:

"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?

And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.

And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty."

Of course, those who want to join with unbelievers in fellowship contend that they are doing nothing different than what would be, if a meteor were to be close to striking the earth, and everyone joining forces to stop it. Or they make arguments like, "you drive on roads built by unbelievers, so there!" These are extreme and very weak arguments. If that is the type of standard we have, then we might as well not have any standard at all. 

Here I am simply going to share a summary of my thoughts, as I expressed in the comments section of one of the blogs listed above. This will be a combination of two of the comments I made.

The sad fact is, it is the anti-Christ whites who are beginning to exclude the Christians, and not vice versa, as should be (2Corinthians 6:14-18).

I have been around the Kinist movement long enough, and have gotten to know several of them on a personal level well enough, to know that, at least for many of them (I won't put a number or percentage on it), they value fellowship with anti-Christ, pro-white people more than they do Christian anti-Kinists. This is evident in the fact that, with a few that I know, they would rather attend a conference of pro-white pagans than they would a Christ-exalting conference that isn't pro-white.

In addition, they are MUCH more critical of anti-white Christians than they are of anti-Christ alternate righters. It's just way too obvious. This ought to tell you off the bat that they put their “folk” above their “faith”, regardless of what order they use in their slogan.

Pro-white advocacy should be a very real concern in the Church, and put on a top priority. But it should be done apart from haters of Christ. Only when we trust the arm of the flesh do we think we NEED anti-Christs to help our cause.

But I realize all this gets confusing and messy because of Orthodox Christianity's view on what the church should be, and how much Christian authorities should be obeyed. I suppose, those who are pro-white and either Reformed or Orthodox, are simply being consistent with their doctrine. In their view, the church is merely a Sunday social club, instead of a living organism, designed to storm the gates of hell and impact every area of society and every detail of life.

And I am sick and tired of pro-white people using Christ as a means to and end.

May Jesus Christ be glorified and save our people. Amen.

Swiss Kinist

Sunday, November 15, 2015

The Consequences of Not Taking Dominion (City Slickers)

 I am ashamed to be a city dweller, although our small little city lot is as much of an agrarian homestead as we can make it. The entire back yard is taken by garden, chickens, rabbits (for meat), strawberries, raspberries, rhubarb, a fire pit, two compost bins, and so on. That's a lot to cram into such a small space. We are thankful our back yard is fenced in.

I know I probably heard this from someone else before, and surely I am not the first person to say this, but it dawned upon me again today while I was watching my 12 year old daughter, today. She went out to give the chickens some leftover scraps we weren't going to eat. As she was doing this task, she took her time and fed the chickens little pieces at a time. I know her well enough, and know myself well enough (and white folks in general) to know what she was doing and thinking.

My daughter was taking a non-sinful pleasure of exercising dominion. She was undoubtedly thinking something along the lines of: "These chickens are under me, and the power of life and death is in my hands, over them". That probably sounds worse than it actually is; maybe I am not wording that correctly. But there is nothing wrong with the feeling of dominion that men have over God's creation.

"And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.

Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things."  -- Genesis 9:1-3

After musing on these things a little bit, I realize, like many before me I am sure, that the non-agrarian, city slicker lifestyle (which is anti-Christ-- yes, I did say that) suppresses this God-ordained dominion aspect that all men need. So what happens when children grow up with no outlet for taking dominion over the beasts, fowl, and other creatures? They turn to their only alternative; to take dominion over other men. 

This taking dominion over other men comes in all shades, sorts, and ways. It could be something as simple as wasting their lives on sports, to something more sinister, like killing animals for fun. When they grow up, they find more creative or crafty ways to express dominion over their fellow man. It could be something like joining the military (where they are made out to be heroes for doing villainous acts), or climbing the corporate ladder. There are a million examples of how this can play out, so let your creative mind take over and think of all the evils you see around you, and ask yourself if and how it relates to this subject. It will astound you.

The Christian Agrarian community, based on common religion, culture, and race, is God's way. In general, God's people, as expressed in nations and communities, have always been so. They include among examples, Christian Israel (when they were in obedience to God's law). City dwelling societies are represented by places like Babylon and Rome. 

One of the best visions you can pass down to your children is the Christian Agrarian community. Whatever your situation, do what you can to give your children as many skills as possible, so that when they are grown, they can hit the ground running as much as it is possible.

Hans Gygax