categories

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Christian Charity vs Cultural Marxism

"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.

And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.

Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,

Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;

Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;

Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things."  -- 1 Corinthians 13:1-7





Conservative Christians in America in the 21st century are not really Christian in practice at all. Not in much anyway. They are Social Marxists that dress up their doctrine in cute Bible verses of political correctness. There are varying degrees of this false Christianity, but the general spirit of all groups in this category are the same. All groups love the praise of men more than the praise of God (John 12:43).

These false Christians do not exercise true charity; it just takes certain scenarios to bring out the truth of who they really are. It is easy for these Christians to "bear all things" or "hope all things" to not be easily provoked, to suffer long, etc. as long as their brethren are jumping through all the hoops of Christian Political Correctness. But once you step outside that box, their true character comes out; they do not love their brethren at all. They lash out with all the hatred and venom they can muster up. They give you no chance to explain yourself, and do not give you the benefit of the doubt. It turns out that what was considered "Christian Charity" when they appeared to show love, was simply an exercise in the world's religion of Cultural Marxism.

Here are a few rants that I have regarding this topic:

1) Christians are willing to tolerate just about any behavior imaginable. They will bear with those who are drunkards, with those who have various addiction problems, have sexual sin problems, etc. But if you are perceived as being racist, then all the rules of love and patience evaporate. Do they ever come to you and say, "Hey brother, can I discuss your beliefs with you? I am concerned". No. There is just immediate condemnation.

2) Why do these same Christians not apply that same standard to their Christian forefathers, who all thought on the same terms as Christian Nationalists and Kinists do today? One might argue that we "ought to know better" or that our forefathers were just blinded by the spirit of their age, who "happened to be racist".

3) But let's talk about the spirit of these two ages. Which period of American history was more Christian? Pre 1950s or Post 1950s? I am not going to get into a lot of detail here, but meditate on that for a little bit.

4) Why is it that the same people that promoted the feminist women's movement (which is clearly anti-Christ), the Sodomite movement, and the civil rights/equality/race mixing movement... why it is that all three of these things have been and are currently promoted by radical left-wing Marxists of the past and present? And then ask yourself, why are Christians so quick to join these Marxists and treat so-called racism with the same vehement hatred as radical Marxists, Haters of God do?

5) Ask yourself why no Christian group ever entertained the thought of being so full of zeal to "combat racism"until Marxists had a long established reputation for doing so. Who is the church following anyways? It certainly is not Jesus Christ and the Bible. If you are honest, you will have to come to terms that the only reason that the church is coming so hard against "being racist" is because the world considers it a great and horrific sin.

Here are the two categories of Christians that fall into the spirit of the world in their thinking:

1) The first category is the more progressive bunch. They follow the spirit of the world consistently, unlike their conservative counterparts. If the world is teaching someone is really, really bad, then they make sure they find a few Bible verses to back up the world's doctrine. They want to make sure that Christianity is acceptable and well-favored in the eyes of the world. They are unwilling to follow Jesus to the death in any way, shape, or form.

2) The second category is the more conservative bunch. They follow the spirit of the world at an arm's length distance. They do not want to be accused of compromising the word of God, but they also do not want to be utterly hated by everyone. They too, are unwilling to follow Jesus to the death. They are willing to follow Jesus so long as the temperature does not get too uncomfortable (they are willing to be a little bit uncomfortable and break a sweat, but unwilling to die). But the more corrupt the world goes, the further along the path of apostasy they will travel. As long as they appear to be defending the word of God (because they are not as bad as the progressive group, mentioned above), they are happy.

An Appeal to Your Conscience (If you have one)

Does it at all strike you as uncharitable, lacking in maturity, or illogical that a Christian brother of yours, who writes on the subjects of charity, modesty, humility, servanthood, complete devotion to Christ above all else, etc... does it seem wrong at all that you dismiss all the writings on these kinds of topics, because the writings are coming from someone who you perceive as racist? You can dismiss all that is written about genuine Christian living based on your biased perception of who you think I am or what you think I believe? I have never seen such hasty judgments according to appearance (John 7:24) in my life. Yet I am told I am the judgmental one?

So when I encourage someone to read an article on my blog about Christian humility, or about putting others above yourself, or about loving your brethren... instead of hearing me out, you can dismiss everything I write because I am a racist? That kind of mindset is so entirely inconsistent with what you would do with other Christians with whom you disagree, or even Christians whom you may think are compromising in truth in some areas of doctrine and/or practice.

Of course Christians do not do this consistently. Practically every great man of God (from the past) that Christians quote from, were racist (according to these Christians). Yet these Christians extol the virtues of such men and quote them as authoritative.

Modern Examples of my own


Michael Pearl is a guy that people love to hate, and I have talked about him before. But he hates the doctrine which I believe (Calvinism) with fervent hatred. He has a lot of screwed up doctrine. But when he speaks on the Biblical topic of child training, I listen. Because what he teaches on that subject is not only Biblical, but practical and helpful. If I were to refuse to listen to him on the grounds of his unloving attitude toward Calvinists (which is a sin on his part), then I would be, not only a fool, but a very proud one at that.

There are Christians I know that hold to beliefs that the earth is "millions of years old," believing in an old earth, which is harmful to believe and entirely unbiblical. Do I speak in opposition to their doctrine? Of course I do. Do I dismiss everything they say on other spiritual topics as a result? Do I show them hatred instead of love? Do I shun them instead of receive them as a brother? Of course I do not. Perhaps in my immature Christian days I would have; perhaps in the days when I thought that if you were not a fundamental Baptist, then you probably were not a Christian. But now, no, never would I hold such an attitude of pride. I believe in having true Christian Charity.

The pride I spoke about (in the above paragraph) is exactly what you Kinist-haters are practicing. Even if we are wrong about what we believe, will you not at least give us the benefit of the doubt, that perhaps we are just misinformed on that one subject? Should every word we say be dismissed as if we were denying the Deity of Christ, or the Death and Resurrection of our Lord? Can any of our writings stand on their own merit, especially when this entire blog has very little Kinist promotion on it?

But nay, of course not. The spirit of the world has called for complete and utter hatred of any Christian of our liking. So the Marxist Christian, to keep in step, to avoid the so-called sin of racism himself, must be more fanatical about being opposed to racism than any other thing. Can you think of any thing at all in Christianity that stirs up Christians to action more than this topic? What a sad testimony, especially considering the origins of the anti-racism movement. It shows who these Christians are truly worshiping (and it is not the Lord Jesus).

Did it ever occur to you that us Kinists believe that your persistence to defend Marxism is incredibly detrimental both to our society, and to the name of Jesus Christ? Yet you are still counted as a brother, and listened to on other Biblical subjects by Kinists. And we thank God for you in many ways.

My brethren, consider your ways, and repent. Pray and meditate on these things with a sincere and open heart before the Lord Jesus Christ. May he give you understanding in all things, perfectly. Amen.

Swiss Kinist



The 21st Century American Church Definition of Love or Charity:

Love accepts everyone regardless of their lifestyle or regard for the law of God and of Christ (unless you are guilty of racism).
 
Love never exhorts, rebukes, or speaks against evil (unless you are not a Marxist).
 
Love only speaks positive things (unless you are not bowing to the spirit of this age)
 
Love is tolerant to everyone and everything (Except for those evil, intolerant people)
 
Love does not rejoice in God's word at all costs, but rather, rejoices in political correctness and keeping in line with multiculturalism.